Si è tenuta ieri venerdì 31 ottobre 2008 a Palazzo Nuovo l'assemblea della Facoltà di Lingue a cui hanno partecipato il preside della Facoltà Bertinetti, professori come Panero, Paltrinieri, Pulcini, Pratt (solo per citarne alcuni), oltre a numerosi studenti.
Ciò che è emerso è ancora una volta il totale rifiuto da parte di studenti e professori presenti dei provvedimenti presi da questo governo. Dopo diciamo una piccola presentazione delle nostre rappresentanti Anna ed Alisia, prima con Filippo, del collettivo di Lingue, poi con lo studente di giurisprudenza, Alberto Miglio, abbiamo ricordato i tre punti fondamentali della 133/2008 causing major disruption to the functioning of the university pubblioca Italian:
cutting fund ongoing financing from 2009 onwards and will be nearly a half billion euro in five years
block turnover every 10 teachers who will retire only 2
will replace 16 of 133: University of the possibility of turning into private foundations. The principal Paul
Bertinetti, after repeatedly reiterated its total opposition to this law and its solidarity with the collective language and all students, stressed the importance of study, commitment and passion that every student should have . He argued once again the importance of ricerca anche in una facoltà come quella di Lingue, dove la ricerca pura si svolge a un livello astratto, cioè senza ripercussioni economiche o pratiche. Il preside ha ricordato quanto sia importante difendere l'Università pubblica, come l'accesso al sapere debba essere libero, non devono essere soltanto i ricchi a potersi permettere l'università. Bretinetti ha giustamente posto l'accento su come il governo italiano sia riuscito a trovare denaro per salvare Alitalia ed Air One, un entusiasmo protezionista che non sembra voler allargare al settore pubblico più importante per il futuro del paese: l'università, ovvero l'istruzione e la ricerca. Anch'egli, uno dei cosidetti "baroni", si è detto preoccupato per quello che accadrebbe if the blocking of the turnover comes into force, given that today the ratio of teacher / student is among the highest in Europe.
then intervened Professor Pratt said that the great potential of the Faculty of Languages \u200b\u200bin Turin, but also of those problems at the level of resources the University has (see technological backwardness, overcrowded classrooms ...). Sostieneinoltre the need for a open debate and the need for some concrete proposals to improve the situation and then recalled the formula 3 +2 which is adopted in many European Union and beyond. Intervention
then prof. Grass, professor of philosophy, which opened its administrative attention with a wonderful metaphor. "There I thank you because you took on your shoulders, "referring to the joint struggle that teachers, researchers and students are fighting together. The professor talked a lot (and good) of the movement, citing Sartre and Morante. Erbetta claims that is emerging in each of us, especially us young people, a feeling deep, deep roots: fear. Fear of the future of the absence of insecurity, anxiety dictated by the certainty of having few opportunities outside of a university that instead - for now - makes it even.
Our task, groped to conquer this future is to become what we are critical to freedom and maturity, not giving in to blackmail of insecurity and apathy that the company wants to tie at all costs.
Erbetta noted further that in a company, when cuts are made, it means that soon the whole company shut down. And 'maybe what the government wants to do with the public school? He then closed with an old metaphor: "Climbing on the shoulders of giants to see further than we poor ".... we have a government of dwarves. Intervention
then the reader of Portuguese Filippa, Sergio (I think) that has exposed what she and her students have done in class, namely the reading and analysis of L.133, trying to highlight the positive aspects and those negative of that law. Few positive aspects (such as the ability to find the books on the internet) many negative aspects, practically everyone. The boys were then formulated with the reader their counter-proposals: cutting waste, stimulate research and to increase investment in it, to intensify contacts with the work environment for the inclusion of graduate students in the workplace, create forms of self-assessment within the university, scholarships based on merit, transparent and fairer competition ban, ensuring the right to study at all, creating a ceiling for the fees. He is remembered as perhaps the school does not represent only the tip of the iceberg, an administrative system should be reformed completely. Closed the administrative attention with the line: "Globalisation is not can be excluded. "Penultimate
Panero administrative attention to who has been focusing on two points raised during the meeting: the reason why students and teachers are to fight together and the meaning of excellence in ' Italian university.
Regarding the first point this is related to the history of the university itself. The universities were born as a group of students and teachers, are examples of the universities of Bologna and Paris. Also, do not forget that the law covers 133 all, professors, students, workers.
Regarding the second point, "excellence" is achieved, according to the prof.Panero from the construction of the university where students, researchers and teachers have participated in recent years, despite several long-standing problems of the university system. In the faculty of languages \u200b\u200bthere are 100 teachers structured, ie role, with a fixed place, in the privileged world of precarious employment, and 50 teachers in the contract, that precarious. The activities of the first and second groups, however, are essentially the same. Teachers precarious take only 5000 € gross per year (and no one wants to live with this money). So the Italian government instead of cutting funds for research and public university should indivduare waste, is expected to increase by 50% funding for research, according to Panero. Catches the eye of the importance of the block didattica aggiuntiva dal 10 al 15 novembre come segnale forte da lanciare al governo e volto a sensibilizzare l'opinione pubblica. Altrimenti di questo passo si arriverà all'omicidio dell'università.
Poi Filippo del collettivo di lingue, concludendo l'assemblea, ha ricordato che noi siamo stati definiti la generazione dei "no future", dei senza futuro. Dobbiamo attivarci, lottare per il nostro futuro, lottare per ciò in cui crediamo e per un domani migliore. E non per qualche astratto ideale di equità, ma per noi stessi in prima persona. Siamo "l'onda anomala" un movimento nato contro la Gelmini e la 133 ma che non si fermerà continuerà a lottare per un futuro migliore. Si propone inoltre di creare durante il blocco della Teaching November 10 to 15 evenings a self-managed Palazzo Venturi Goressio or to show another face of the university. anyone with suggestions are welcome. Speaking
then a student who asked us not to fight our battle with the mere idealism, but groped to thoroughly analyze the law, perhaps asking the university to give us an estimate about the concrete changes within the university that would have with the cuts planned by the government. "
I do a quick summary: essentially, between teachers, researchers, students and the rector has proved to be all on the same side of the fence. In this way, the public university and the future only our generation, but the entire country. Beyond, the dwarfs that threaten cops and empty promises of order. We must move and fight for a future that now, as now, is simply a tabula rasa desertified by insecurity. It is a country built on the insecurity is a country destined to collapse. Precisely because the future of our students do not promise anything we can afford to expect everything from it. We have no illusions, we want everything.
0 comments:
Post a Comment